I just checked Ravelry, and there are 11,537 people ahead of me. I think that's hilarious.
I am pretty sure that while it will be nice to have access, my track record with so-called social networking sites indicates that I will not be doing much with Ravelry. I have a Facebook page now, since more and more librarians are using that as a way of giving more access to patrons. But I forget to look at it, and don't do anything much with it. I did have fun and waste most of one day creating an avatar for myself though. After getting an invitation from a colleague, I joined Shelfari, which is a booklovers social network. You create a bookshelf with titles you choose -- books you love, books you want to read, etc -- and there are groups you can join: scifi or travel writing or mystery lovers, etc. I set it up, which was fun, but I haven't done much with that either, though that, and a book my sister sent me, helped me rediscover my love of travel writing. I have the feeling I will be using Ravelry (when I get on in the year 2020) the way I use the web now: looking for images of finished projects so that I can get an idea of what the project looks like or how a yarn knits up.
On the other hand, the type of social networking (small s, small n) that blogs and sites like Knitters Review have enabled means I now have knitting friends, folks I would not have met otherwise, who I can visit as I travel or enjoy via online conversations. So I agree with the Harlot's comment in the article on the new knitting stars this summer (was that in Vogue Knitting?) when she said that the internet made knitting social. I know my on-again off-again attempts at becoming a competent independent knitter took off in big ways once the internet enabled the creation of knitting e-lists. A paradox, that I became an independent knitter by becoming a more social knitter? Nope. The shared expertise and experiences helped me learn so much that I am no longer knitting blindly. It helped me become what Anna Zilboorg called a knitting anarchist.
Last night I was a Virtual Librarian for three hours and didn't have many calls. So I was playing with knitting while sitting at the computer. It had occured to me a while ago (and I believe I blogged about it) that my mental block against converting flat knitting stitch patterns into circular patterns would disappear if I just charted the pattern. The extra stitches (i.e., the pattern is worked on 8 stitches +3) always confused me. So, since I was still looking for a pattern to use on the Anne socks, I sat down with Walkers' Treasury of Knitting Stitches and opened a Word document. I loooooooove using the knitting font Laritza told us
about. I just created a table and changed to the knitting font. The conversion turns out to be so absolutely completely glaringly obvious and simple I can't believe I have wasted years saying I couldn't convert between flat and circular stitch patterns. So far I have only tried knit and purl patterns, but still, I can even imagine seeing it clearly for lace. Anyway, I ended up charting and using a King Charles Brocade stitch on the Anne socks. Because of the colors in the yarn, it will be kinda subtle, but I really like it. And picking up these socks again reminded me of my recent discovery of how fantastic the Anne feels as I knit. So I thought I would do a little list here of my responses to the different socks yarns I splurged on or used from the stash since spring.
Opal I did not love knitting with the Opal handpainted yarn. I found the yarn rough to the touch as I knit. I have already worn the socks (we had a little cold snap, though we are back to the high 70s/low 80s this weekend) and liked wearing them well enough. But I don't think I will use more Opal.
Regia Step Line This also seemed a bit rough to my hands, though I really liked how the colors/short stripes in the yarn worked up. If I came across more of this stuff on sale, I might be tempted but there is a lot of softer sock yarn around.
Froehlich Blauband Special This stuff is no longer available. Froehlich, a European company that made very nice yarns of all types, went out of business when the mill they used went bankrupt and took their inventory with them. Fortunately for me, my LYSO was their US distributor, and I managed to stock up on all sorts of Froehlich products. The Blauband Special sock yarn was wonderful. That's what I am using for the socks I showed in the last entry to this blog. It is much softer than the Regia and the Opal. So I definitely will be using whatever I have in the stash, which I think is actually quite a bit.
(A few minutes later...)
I just went and looked at the stash. All the yarn is supposed to be in one closet now, and most of it is. I went through looking for the Blauband. I don't like shopping in yarn stores that organize by color, but I do like organizing my own stash that way, except for the sock yarns. Think I'll move them all to their own cubby. Anyway, here is most of the Froehlich Blauband stash -- I actually have two of each color. I suspect that I have a few other skeins here and there. So I have enough for at least 10 pairs of socks! Most of it was purchased over the year at the LYS sales. The solid colors are a bit softer than the twists and the tweeds.
Since I succumbed to consumer desire this summer and bought a lot of the trendy artisan-produced sock yarns, I have those to compare now too, though the Anne is the only one I have started working with. So I will be reviewing those as I wind 'em and knit 'em, though my first impression of the Zen Yarn Garden is that it may not be as soft as, for example, the J.Knits. Eventually then I will be talking about Lorna's Laces Sock, Lisa Souza Sock!, Dream in Color Smooshy, J. Knits, Zen Yarn Garden, Bearfoot (like the Schaefer Anne?), and Cherry Tree Hill Sockittome. I bought some of it from folks who were destashing -- there's another form of social networking.


