While I was happy to find the fall issue of Interweave Knits in my mailbox, I ended up enjoying the colors and yarn images but not finding anything to spur excitement or creativity on my part. And while that might be a lot to ask of a magazine, isn't that the point of magazines about creative processes? I gew up the daughter of a magazine publisher, so on the economic side, I really do know that the point of commercial magazines is to provide a forum for advertisers. But from the point of view of the reader, and the editorial staff, exciting creativity is also the point.
Then, at the supermarket, I saw this issue of Vogue Knitting. Their 25th anniversary issue. Their 20th anniversary issue is one of my favorites, so I grabbed it. This is going to be, by the way, a rave review, with just one -- or two -- small complaints.
So, what did I like? First, as many magazines do these days, the magazine actually had 10 "covers" inside the front cover. To the pleasure, I am sure, of the advertising department, each of the interior covers was dedicated to a yarn company -- on the right side we had a Vogue Knitting cover showcasing a pattern and on the left-facing page we had past patterns produced by that yarn company and the history of the company. Each cover pattern is available from vogueknitting.com. I found it interesting reading, when I managed to get the glare off the page. (To the production department: readability is important too.) Oh, here is my complaint -- it was not all that intuitive to find the patterns on the Vogue Knitting page (which I why I linked it above), and several items throughout the magazines that are supposedly available on vogueknitting.com were nowhere to be found (like Nicky Epstein's individual patterns for sale, as offered on page 18. Oh, and if you find the hairpin lace pattern -- pp. 38-42 -- on the website, let me know, OK?) When I did find the patterns, though, I downloaded a few of them, including an amazing Shirley Paden fair isle dress called Karat. This appears to be the dress issue for both IK and Vogue. The Paden dress, however, is not ribbed to show off tiny 24-year-old bodies and will be an interesting challenge to knit. As usual, Paden does the shaping by changing the gauge -- I will have to swatch to see how that well that works. And I won't be making it in the metallic yarn it is shown in. They also have a Kaffe Fassett pattern for download.
In the center of the magazine is an advertising insert several pages long in which yarn companies show off patterns and give a website for the pattern. I downloaded a very nice stole from Classic Elite and have my eye on a Koigue pattern. But here is my other complaint: if you knew you were showcasing a product in a Vogue Knitting anniversary issue -- wouldn't you make sure the product was available? The Koigu pattern is "forthcoming." The new BagSmith Attache is nowhere to be found, even on their website. The website in the ad for the gorgeous Knitting Pottery takes you to the wholesaler. Dear Publishers and Knitting Companies: showcasing items on the web only works if the item is there. Right?
I also loved the interviews with the Knitting Old Guard and the Knitting New Guard, but here I really want to give Stephanie props. Her answers made that interview. I loved her answers. Her brilliant answer on p. 90 -- "I don't think it was the Internet. I'd say it was the socialization of knitting." YES! Her statement of character on p. 92 "I never thought about trying to figure out who was first." YES! And when she pointed out that Elizabeth Zimmerman created a knitting cottage industry before the internet -- YES!. As Stephanie says, we now have better tools but I really appreciated her thinking about how the tools were being used. As a former media professor and now librarian, I am very tired of folks presenting "the Internet" as the explanation for complex change. Knitting and the internet are a spectacular combination, but exactly for the reasons Stephanie gives -- it vastly increased the possibility for making knitting social, and extended the possibilities for cottage industries. She continued to give great answers throughout that reminded me why I love to read her blog.
What else inspired a make-me impulse? To my surprise, the cover scarf, Nicky Epstein's with knitted flowers. I am not a fan of knitted flowers but do like the scarf. And Shirley Paden's lace scarf. I
was not impressed with the reworked 1980s sweaters, though one of the ones displayed on the inside JCA/Reynolds cover -- the one on the right -- was on one of the first Vogue Magazines I ever bought. I loved that sweater. I yearned for the sweater, though even then I knew it was way too huge to wear.
Also in this issue: a number of lace garments that I marked for the to-do list. A third Shirley Paden item -- a lace pullover -- with a big unattached collar. On their Fashion Preview page it is the red lace pullover just about the title "Well Red." I think I would make mine without the collar and as usual the sizing is skimpy. I will upsize this one using a heavier yarn I think. There is also a really nice lace hoodie by Mari Lynn Patrick. Unfortunately the size Large measures 35" around (that's large?) so it will need upsizing as well. Lily Chin has a very nice lace dress that I would wear over this black jersey sleeveless dress I have -- my thanks to the designer for providing 6 different sizes. Iris Schreier had a lace cardigan using the technique she showcases in her book Lacy Little Knits, knitting one row with a very fine yarn and the next with something heavier. I did break down over the weekend and order the book from Knitpicks.
There are of course a number of patterns that showed Vogue Knitting at its most what-were-they-thinking state. The long, tweedy, novelty-yarn multicolored coat with stripes of fake fur. The worst, in my opinion of course (this is my blog) was the so-called "urban ethnic" skirt pattern shown as a sleeveless dress (!!). It comes closer to working as a skirt but even then... Horizontally striped panels, knit with novelty yarns, with alternating black panels...
My knitting, at this point: ongoing projects, with nothing exciting to show. I am resisting my chronic startitis, since I am already feeling like I have too many projects going at once. (Shhh -- I made significant progress on an important UFO -- close to done now.)
My cats: funny. Still running relay races down the hall. Frannie still runs if I reach down to pet her in the hallway but demands intense petting sessions in bed -- I also found a brush she will tolerate and brushed her for a long time in bed last night, thus collecting pounds of cat fur that I would otherwise wear to work.